地震灾后重建绩效测量——以汶川、玉树、芦山地震为例

灾后重建是保障地震灾区群众重归正常生产生活的重要工作,那么如何测量灾后重建绩效,哪些因素会影响灾后重建绩效?文章回顾了灾后重建绩效相关研究文献,在此基础上认为效果和效率是灾后重建绩效的两大方面,以"消除灾害影响并恢复到灾前水平所用的时间"作为衡量灾后重建绩效的标准,能够反映灾后重建的效果和效率,具有可行性。以此为基础建立了灾后重建绩效的分析框架和测量方法,并选择汶川地震、玉树地震和芦山地震作为案例,对三次地震灾区的重建绩效进行了对比分析并简要分析了绩效差异原因。结果表明,三次地震灾后重建基本如期完成了灾后重建目标任务,但因存在灾害程度不同、对口支援质量不同等原因,三次地震灾后重建绩效存在一定差异。

Performance measurement of post disaster reconstruction: Taking Wenchuan, Yushu, Lushan Earthquake as examples

Post disaster reconstruction is an important job to ensure the return to normal production and life of the people in the earthquake stricken areas. So, how to measure the performance of post disaster reconstruction? Which factors will affect the performance of post disaster reconstruction? This paper reviews the related literature on performance of post disaster reconstruction. On this basis, this paper argues that the effect and efficiency are two major aspects of the performance of post disaster reconstruction. So, using the time spent in eliminating the impact of disasters and returning to the pre disaster level as standard of measuring the reconstruction performance can reflect the reconstruction effect and efficiency. It has feasibility. Based on this, this paper establishes an analytical framework and measurement method for post disaster reconstruction performance. Taking the Wenchuan earthquake, the Yushu earthquake and the Lushan earthquake as the cases, the paper compares and analyzes the reconstruction performance of the three earthquake stricken areas, and briefly analyzes the reasons for the performance differences. The results show that the three earthquake reconstruction basically completed the goal of post disaster reconstruction on schedule, but because of the different degree of disaster, different quality of reconstruction after disaster, there are some differences in the performance of the three post-earthquake reconstruction.