| 陪审团事实裁决终局性的理据 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何永军.陪审团事实裁决终局性的理据[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,37(1):90-94. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何永军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明,650500 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 陪审团对事实的裁决之所以具有终局性,根据在于其裁决是公意的反映,其审判是基于同意的统治,陪审团与法官之间的分权制衡有利于保障其裁判的公正性,陪审团决策中立、民主和科学使其裁决的可靠性具有保障,陪审团是非负责机构无法对其追究责任。但人不是万能的,陪审团的原则和精神在现实中也难以完全落到实处,其裁决也时常犯错误,故有必要向相关人士提供救济机会。陪审制的内在逻辑及其蕴含的政治智慧,对于我国的司法改革极具启发价值。
|
| 关 键 词： | 陪审团 法律审 事实审 既判力 人民陪审员 |
On Grounds of Finality of the Jury's Fact-finding |
| |
| HE Yong-jun.On Grounds of Finality of the Jury's Fact-finding[J].Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science),2012,37(1):90-94. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Yong-jun |
| |
| Institution: | HE Yong-jun(Law School,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming,Yunan 650500,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The finality of jury system comes from public will and rule by consent,and it is also due to the separation of power between judge and jury and its reliability from its neutral,democratic and scientific decision.Jury system is not an agency which can take the responsibility.And the principles and ideas of jury system can not be fully displayed.Mistakes can be made which claims for relief.Much information can be drawn in the reform of people’s jury system and solve the problems in judicial system at large in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | jury system trial in law trial in fact unchangeableness of judgment people’s assessor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
