论合作原则在庭审话语中的体现及其法律规范---以“薄案一审中的被告人辩解为例

合作原则认为交谈参与者在整体交谈过程中所说的话都要符合交谈的目标或者方向以确保交际者持续地进行有意义的语言交际。尽管学界对合作原则存在着诸多质疑和修正，通过对薄案一审中的被告人辩解进行话语分析，仍然能够清晰地看到合作原则在法庭机构话语中的运行轨迹。合作原则在法庭审判中的运用具有价值中立性．审判人员需要甄别合作与非合作的真正动机及其证据支撑，而不能为纯粹语言技巧所迷惑，并在促进有益合作与防治恶意合作之间进行灵活切换。

The Exemplification and Legal Regulation of Cooperative Principle in Courtroom Discourse--Taking Bo Xilai＇ s Utterance in the First Instance as an Example

According to cooperative principle, participants of a conversation need to comply with the purpose of conversation so as to continue a meaningful communication. Although some scholars have doubted and corrected the cooperative principle, yet through the analysis of the utterance of Bo Xilai in courtroom trial it is quite clear how cooperative principle works. In the application of courtroom trial, the neutrality of cooperative principle is of significance because judicial officers need to identify the motivation and supporting evidence of real cooperative and non-cooperative participation instead of being confused by the language skills, while facilitating beneficial cooperation and preventing malicious cooperation.