首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“国家哲社科学基金项目”成果焉可错谬百出——对黄浩教授《从文学信仰时代到文学失仰时代》的学术批评
引用本文:郑惠生.“国家哲社科学基金项目”成果焉可错谬百出——对黄浩教授《从文学信仰时代到文学失仰时代》的学术批评[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,25(5):17-24.
作者姓名:郑惠生
作者单位:汕头职业技术学院人文社科系,广东汕头,515041
摘    要:所谓"出生"和"长大"都不曾离开过"神水"的"文学信仰时代",实际上并不存在。所谓今天"人们对文学失去了信仰"的这一结论也不能成立。《从文学信仰时代到文学失仰时代》一文存在着诸多的问题——不但其主要观点是极端片面化的,而且在论证的过程中也错谬百出。尤为严重的是,该文充斥着煽情性的宣称、臆想性的断言、绝对化的措辞和非逻辑的表述。该文是一篇冠以"国家哲学社会科学基金项目"的论文,是一篇代表着国家哲学社会科学水平的文章。而这,就不免让人感到吃惊,也让人深感忧虑。

关 键 词:学术批评  国家哲学社会科学基金项目  学术成果  宗教  学术质量

Ridiculous Mistakes in Academic Achievement Sponsored by National Philosophy and Social Sciences Funding: A Criticism of "From Literature Belief Age to Age of Loss of Belief in Literature" by Professor Huang Hao
Abstract:The so-called "literature belief age" which has been holy from birth to adulthood does not exist actually.The statement does not hold water that "people have lost belief in literature." The article "From Literature Belief Age to Age of Loss of Belief in Literature" has many problems.Its major points are partial and extreme,and also the supporting process has errors here and there.What is worse,it is filled with emotion arousing claims,speculative statements,absolute languages,and illogical presentation.This article,sponsored by "National Philosophy and Social Sciences Funding," and supposed to represent the national level in the philosophy and social sciences,is surprisingly worrying.
Keywords:academic criticism  national philosophy and social sciences funding program  academic achievements  literature  religion  academic quality
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号