首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论朱光潜先生《谈美书简》的局限性——兼向国家教育部提建议
引用本文:郑惠生.论朱光潜先生《谈美书简》的局限性——兼向国家教育部提建议[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,25(1):10-13.
作者姓名:郑惠生
作者单位:汕头职业技术学院人文社科系,广东,汕头,515041
摘    要:虽然"拨乱反正"是中国政治生活中的一件大好事,但以此为出发点的"美论",却仍然很有可能以"政治的逻辑"替代"学术的逻辑"。一本书的价值不单取决于该书的客观属性,而且还受到了价值主体的需求和接受水平的制约。既然《谈美书简》是"新课标"向中学生推荐的读物,那么,就应该对其接受的可行性进行分析。朱光潜先生的《谈美书简》不适合高中生们阅读,建议国家教育部修改《普通高中语文课程标准》(实验)"课外读物的建议"部分。

关 键 词:学术批评  朱光潜  《谈美书简》  局限性

Limitations of Zhu Guangqian's Tanmei Shujian
ZHENG Hui-sheng.Limitations of Zhu Guangqian's Tanmei Shujian[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2009,25(1):10-13.
Authors:ZHENG Hui-sheng
Institution:Department of Humanities and Social Sciences;Shantou Polytechnic;Shantou;Guangdong 515041
Abstract:It was a good deed to check the tendency of turmoil and return to the correct path in the Chinese political life.But the aesthetic theory starting from this point might have substituted "political logic" for "academic logic." The value of a book is not only decided by its objective traits but also bound by the needs and receptive capacity of the subject of value.Since Tanmei Shujian 谈美书简(Essays on Beauty)is a book recommended to the middle school students by New Course Syllabus,the analysis of its feasibility of acceptance is worthy of being analyzed.This book is not suitable for the middle school students to read.It is suggested that the Ministry of Education of China modify the part of "Suggestions for Extracurricular Readings" collected in Chinese Language Course Criteria in General Senior Middle School.
Keywords:academic criticism  Zhu Guangqian  Tanmei Shujian  limitations  times  acceptance  logic  suggestions  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号