| 中国城乡人力资本投资收益非对称性特征及其后果 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 侯风云,邹融冰.中国城乡人力资本投资收益非对称性特征及其后果[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,19(4):16-22. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 侯风云 邹融冰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东大学,经济学院,山东,济南,250100
2. 山东德州粮食学校,山东,德州,235015 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金课题“中国人力资本投资与城乡就业相关性研究”(01BJL001)的部分研究成果。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国人力资本投资收益在城乡呈现出非对称性的特征。在农村,这种非对称性表现为投资收益外溢城市,而在城市则没有形成投资收益对农村的外溢,只表现为投资收益内溢城市区域自身,其结果则是农村的发展因缺乏必要的人力资本而受到限制,致使中国城乡发展的差距不断扩大。应该发挥政府作用,大力加强对农村各种形式的人力资本投资。
|
| 关 键 词： | 人力资本 两区域模型 非对称性 城乡差别 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0766(2005)04-0016-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年1月21日 |
Asymmetrical Features of the Returns of Human Capital Investment in China's Urban and Rural Areas and Consequences |
| |
| HOU Feng-yun,ZOU Rong-bing.Asymmetrical Features of the Returns of Human Capital Investment in China''''s Urban and Rural Areas and Consequences[J].Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition),2005,19(4):16-22. |
| |
| Authors: | HOU Feng-yun ZOU Rong-bing |
| |
| Abstract: | The returns of human capital investment in China's urban and rural areas are rather asymmetrical. In the country, this asymmetry is demonstrated as the spillover of investment returns to the city, but the city only has such spillover to the city itself, not to the country. As a result, rural development is restricted because of lack of necessary human capital investment, which causes the increasing gap between the development of urban and rural areas. The government should increase human capital investment in different forms in rural areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | human capital two-region model asymmetry difference between urban and rural areas |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
