首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

比较法视野中的定罪事实与量刑事实之证明——严格证明与自由证明的具体运用
引用本文:康怀宇.比较法视野中的定罪事实与量刑事实之证明——严格证明与自由证明的具体运用[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(2).
作者姓名:康怀宇
作者单位:四川大学,法学院,四川,成都,610064
摘    要:定罪事实与量刑事实的划分在证据法上的意义在于,对定罪事实必须进行严格证明,而对狭义量刑事实及某些属于犯罪事实的量刑情节,允许进行自由证明.严格证明与自由证明在可以运用的证据范围、证据调查方法和证明标准等方面存在差异.对定罪事实的严格证明体现了证据法对于权力的制约功能,对量刑事实进行自由证明则综合考虑了减少诉讼成本、明确主要争点和扩大有利于被告人之量刑资料的适用机会等多种因素.作为对自由证明的限制,在量刑阶段,除了必须保障被告人对量刑资料与信息的知情权和异议权、获得律师帮助权等各项权利之外,审判还应该被划分为定罪与量刑两个互相分离的阶段,以防止不可采的品格证据所产生的不公正对定罪造成影响.

关 键 词:定罪事实与量刑事实  狭义量刑事实  严格证明  自由证明  自由证明的限度

A Comparative Study on Proof of Facts of Conviction and Facts of Sentencing:the Concrete Application of Strict Proof and Free Proof
KANG Huaiyu.A Comparative Study on Proof of Facts of Conviction and Facts of Sentencing:the Concrete Application of Strict Proof and Free Proof[J].Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition),2009(2).
Authors:KANG Huaiyu
Institution:Law School;Sichuan University;Chengdu;Sichuan 610064;China
Abstract:On evidence law, the significance of classifying facts into facts of conviction and facts of sentencing is that strictproof should be applicable to facts of conviction, whereas facts of sentencing in a narrow sense and some facts of sentencing belonging to criminal facts could be proved by means of freeproof. There are discrepancies on the scope of admissible evidence, the means of evidential investigation, and the standard of proof between strictproof and freeproof. The strictproof that is applicable to fa...
Keywords:Facts of Conviction and Facts of Sentencing  Facts of Sentencing in a Narrow Sense  Strict Proof  Free Proof  Limitation of Free Proof  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号