| 误读与澄清:反垄断执法和解制度之本相追问 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周琳静,殷继国.误读与澄清:反垄断执法和解制度之本相追问[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(1):62-67. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周琳静 殷继国 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南京师范大学法学院,江苏 南京,210046
2. 华南理工大学法学院,广东 广州,510006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 反垄断执法机关与涉嫌垄断经营者以和解方式结案已成为各国的普遍做法,我国《反垄断法》也引进了反垄断执法和解制度。然而,人们对该制度存在一些误读,认为执法和解程序属于非正式程序,执法和解契约在性质上属于公法契约,反垄断执法和解会降低反垄断法的威慑效果。实际上,反垄断执法和解制度之本相是:执法和解程序属于正式程序,执法和解契约在性质上属于公私法混合契约,执法和解会提升反垄断法的整体威慑力度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断执法和解 正式程序 和解契约 威慑理念 |
Misunderstanding and Clarification: A Detailed Inquiry About the Truth of Settlement System of Antitrust Law Enforcement |
| |
| ZHOU Lin-jing
,
YIN Ji-guo.Misunderstanding and Clarification: A Detailed Inquiry About the Truth of Settlement System of Antitrust Law Enforcement[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science),2012,14(1):62-67. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Lin-jing YIN Ji-guo |
| |
| Institution: | 1.School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China;2.School of Law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The way that many antitrust cases are closed by settlement in many foreign countries is a common practice,and China’s Antitrust Law has also introduced the settlement system of antitrust law enforcement.However,misunderstandings do exist.Some people hold that settlement procedure is an informal one,whereas the settlement contract is a public treaty in nature and the settlement of antitrust law enforcement will reduce the deterrent effect of antitrust laws.In effect,the truth of settlement of antitrust law enforcement is that settlement procedure is a formal one,the settlement contract is a public-private mixed treaty,and the settlement will promote the integral deterrent effect of antitrust laws. |
| |
| Keywords: | settlement of antitrust law enforcement formal procedure settlement contract idea of deterrence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
