质疑“卢梭是个人本位论者的教育学断言”

在中国，存在着一个令人诧异的教育学误解：卢梭一直被认为是典型的个人本位论者。卢梭其实并不是以儿童本性为基础来阐述他的教育学说的；他提出的“自然状态”及其“自然人”概念只是一种观念假设，他理想中的教育也并不是以此作为追寻的目标，“自然状态”及其“自然人”概念只是为批判卢梭所反对的社会而服务的：他理想中的教育实质上只是为知识分子处于统治地位的集权政治服务的。总之，他不仅不是一个个人本位论者，而且还是一个典型的社会本位论者，是为知识分子专制进行辩护的代言人。

Is Rousseau a Typical Representative of the Individual Standard Theory

In China, there is a surprising pedagogy misunderstanding：Rousseau has been always regarded as a typical representative of individual standard theory. As a matter of fact, Rousseau＇s understanding of education was not based on his comprehended ＂Children Nature＂. He advocated being ＂Nature State＂ and ＂Nature Being＂, which are not the objectives of his desired education but a kind of conception hypothesis. His ideal education, in fact, served for the centralized politics with intellectuals as the ruling class. Therefore, it can be concluded that he is by no means a representative of individual standard theory, but a typical representative of the social standard theory.