首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论清末教育的发展、腐败与落后
引用本文:秦学智.论清末教育的发展、腐败与落后[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社会科学版),2003,19(2):14-18.
作者姓名:秦学智
作者单位:北京师范大学教育学院 北京100875
摘    要:清末教育有发展、有腐败、也有落后。教育腐败论者不能很好地把教育腐败与教育发展和教育落后区分开来。教育腐败论产生的缘由是对政治、经济与教育的关系,生产力、生产关系与教育的关系及经济基础与上层建筑的关系等问题认识不清。"教育腐败"充其量只是教育生产关系上的腐败或说非正常化。"教育落后"可能是教育腐败引起的,但"教育落后"并不等同于"教育腐败"。要坚信"教育在发展"理论的正确性,对祖国的未来和未来的教育满怀信心。

关 键 词:清末教育  发展  教育腐败  教育落后
文章编号:1008-4444(2003)02-0014-05
修稿时间:2003年2月22日

On the Development, Corruption and Backwardness of Education in Late Qing Dynasty
Abstract:Education in late Qing Dynasty is of development, corruption and backwardness. Those who advocate for the point that education in late Qing Dynasty is corrupt can't tell clearly educational corruption from its development and backwardness. The reason for the opinion that it is corrupt form is that there is no clear knowledge of the relation between politics, economics and education, between productive forces, productive relation and education, between economic base and superstructure etc. Educational corruption is corruption of education in productive relation at most. Educational backwardness may be caused by educational corruption, but they are not equal. We should hold strong belief in the correction of the theory of developing education and the future of our motherland as well as its education.
Keywords:education in late Qing Dynasty  development  educational corruption  educational backwardness  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号