| 论预期违约 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 关中烈.论预期违约[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2004,21(5):95-98. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 关中烈 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南公安高等专科学校,湖南,长沙,410138 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 预期违约,源于英美法系,分成两种形态:明示预期违约和默示预期违约.不安抗辩权源于大陆法系,其功能与默示预期违约相似.两者既有重叠又互为独立,我国新<合同法>对两者都进行了继承.
|
| 关 键 词： | 预期违约 构成条件 适用缺陷 不安抗辩权 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-0598(2004)05-0095-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年9月26日 |
On expected breach of contract |
| |
| GUAN Zhong-lie.On expected breach of contract[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2004,21(5):95-98. |
| |
| Authors: | GUAN Zhong-lie |
| |
| Abstract: | Expected breach of contract comes from British and American laws and is classified into clear expected breach of contract and silent expected breach of contract. Uneasy right to plea comes from continental law and its function is similar to silent expected breach of contract. The two items overlap and are independent and are carried on in China's new Contract Law. |
| |
| Keywords: | expected breach of contract condition suitable shortcomings uneasy right to plea |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
