首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

疑义利益解释原则解析--兼论我国《保险法》第31条的完善
引用本文:张昌明.疑义利益解释原则解析--兼论我国《保险法》第31条的完善[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(2):71-74.
作者姓名:张昌明
作者单位:重庆工商大学,法学院,重庆400067
摘    要:疑义利益解释原则是解释保险合同时必须遵循的一个基本原则,它的产生从而适用都有其特定的前提条件.在该原则的理解和运用中要特别注意,争议不等于疑义,有疑义也未必要作对投保人有利的解释,而当存在多种有利解释时应该选择最有利的解释.我国<保险法>第31条的规定存在严重缺陷,必须根据具体问题具体分析的大原则进行完善,以适应实践中个性化特约条款备受重视和非格式化保险合同大量出现的新情况.

关 键 词:疑义利益解释原则  保险合同条款  保险法  立法建议
文章编号:1672-0598(2005)02-0071-04
修稿时间:2004年11月6日

The on-behalf-of-applicants doctrine and the perfection of Article 31 in China's insurance law
ZHANG Chang-ming.The on-behalf-of-applicants doctrine and the perfection of Article 31 in China's insurance law[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2005,22(2):71-74.
Authors:ZHANG Chang-ming
Abstract:The on-behalf-of-applicants doctrine is the basic doctrine of interpretation of insurance contract clauses, the origin and the application of the doctrine are all based on some presupposition. Disputation is not equal to ambiguity. It is not necessary to interpret the ambiguous clause on behalf of the applicant of an insurance contract. The most beneficial interpretation must be chosen when there are more than two kinds of interpretations of a clause. The article 31 in China's insurance law must be amended because of serious defects in order to adapt itself to the new reality of insurance.
Keywords:the on-behalf-of-applicants doctrine  insurance contract clause  insurance law  legislative proposal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号