法律推理从“逻辑独白”到“实践对话”的位移

法律推理过程包含着权力与利益、应然与实然、确定性与妥当性、客观解释与主观解释、逻辑与价值、语言与事件、思维与表达、认知与行动等诸多矛盾.在司法能动主义与司法克制主义、自然法学与分析法学、实证主义与现实主义、分析哲学与经验哲学的碰撞中,法律已经由文本所体现的规范层面转向法律施行的实践层面,法律推理已经由“逻辑独白”位移到“实践理性”.

Displacement of Legal Reasoning from ＂Logical Monologue＂ to ＂Practice Dialogue＂

Legal reasoning process consists of power and interests, and the reality of course, certainty and proper, objective interpretation and subjective interpretation, logic and values, language and e-vents, thought and expression, cognition and action, and many contradictions. In collisions of judicial activism and judicial restraint, natural law and analysis of law, positivism and realism, analytic phi- losophy and experience philosophy, the law has been reflected by the text normative level steering laws in force practical level. And it has been reviewed by legal reasoning ＂logical monologue＂ to ＂practical reason＂ for displacement.