| 就《香港小说史》（第一卷）敬答范伯群先生 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 袁良骏.就《香港小说史》（第一卷）敬答范伯群先生[J].苏州科技学院学报(社会科学版),2004,21(2):68-73. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 袁良骏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京,100732 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 就《香港小说史》(第一卷)敬答范伯群先生:1、《香港小说史》的著者在该书以及其他文章中,对金庸的评价具有一致性、连续性;2、"通俗文学"、"严肃文学"的划分并不科学,要逐步扬弃这两个概念;3、因论述范围所限,黄小配等人的章回小说未能涉及,拟在第二卷中加一个附录对其作专论,以资弥补;4、著作在资料工作方面主要有清理香港小说的资料状况和发展脉络、以及发掘被遗忘杂志的成绩,而遗憾也有不少。
|
| 关 键 词： | 金庸评价 新剑仙派武侠小说家 严肃文学 通俗文学 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-0695(2004)02-0068-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月5日 |
A Reply to Mr Fan Bo-qun Concerning History of HK Novels(Vol.1) |
| |
| YUAN Liang-jun.A Reply to Mr Fan Bo-qun Concerning History of HK Novels(Vol.1)[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou:Social Science,2004,21(2):68-73. |
| |
| Authors: | YUAN Liang-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | My reply to Mr Fan Bo-qun concerning History of HK novels runs as follows:(1)The author's comments on Jin Yong have a consisitent and continuous feature;(2)the distinction between "popular literature" and "serious literature" is unscientific and the two concepts must be abandoned;(3)owingto the space limitation, Huang Xiaopei's novels with each chapter headed by a couplet giving the gist of its content are unmentioned,and a monograph of Huang's novels will be appended to the second volume;(4)the book sorts out the data of HK novels, as a result of which some old magazines are rescued from oblivion. |
| |
| Keywords: | comments on Jin Yong martial arts fiction serious literature popular literature |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
