首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论债权的相对性与不可侵性的关系
引用本文:梅夏英,邹启钊.论债权的相对性与不可侵性的关系[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,18(1):18-23.
作者姓名:梅夏英  邹启钊
作者单位:对外经济贸易大学,法学院,北京,100029
摘    要:第三人是否可以侵害债权与债权的相对性密切相关。债权的相对性肇端于罗马法,但在近代具有了新的底蕴,承载了债权的自由价值与秩序价值。相对性与不可侵性是债权在不同领域分别表现出来的两种特性,两者可以并存于债权中,但在第三人侵害债权责任的构成要件方面,债权的相对性又决定了应引入"善良风俗"原则对其加以限制。

关 键 词:债权  侵权  相对性  不可侵性
文章编号:1002-3194(2005)01-0018-06
修稿时间:2004年6月17日

On the Relationship Between the Relativity of Creditor's Rights and the Impossibility of Infringement
MEI Xia-ying,ZOU Qi-zhao.On the Relationship Between the Relativity of Creditor''''s Rights and the Impossibility of Infringement[J].Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2005,18(1):18-23.
Authors:MEI Xia-ying  ZOU Qi-zhao
Abstract:It's a problem relevant to creditor's rights relativity whether the creditor's rights could be infringed by a third party. Creditor's rights relativity originated from Roman law. Later during its development, it obtained new implications and thus had the values of freedom and order attached to it. Relativity and possibility to be infringed are different characteristics in different aspects of creditor's rights, so they could co-exist in creditor's rights. Owing to "relativity", "good custom" should be introduced to decide whether creditor's rights are infringed when establishing its constituting factors.
Keywords:creditor's rights  infringement  relativity  in possibility to be infringed  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号