不同类型研究机构卫生技术评估研究结果转化情况的比较研究

目的:通过对不同类型研究机构的卫生技术评估(HTA)研究结果转化情况的比较,为扩大HTA的决策使用提供科学依据?方法:采用自设问卷,开展针对国内HTA研究者的问卷调查,通过Likert 五分法描述HTA研究结果转化情况,运用秩和检验进行差异分析?结果:虽然在HTA转化利用方面的差异尚无统计学意义,但在组织支持?研究过程?认知水平?研究产出方式?研究质量方面,来自高校和非高校机构研究者之间的一些差异均有统计学意义?结论:为促进HTA研究结果的决策转化,建议确立促进HTA决策转化的支持机制,强化与决策方的沟通交流协作,提高转化认知水平,采用适宜且多样的研究结果产出方式?

Comparative analysis of knowledge translation of health technology assessment research between different types of research institues

Objective: To compare the differences in health technology assessment (HTA) knowledge translation between different types of research institutes and provide some scientific evidences to expand HTA impact in the process of policy-making. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was implemented to domestic HTA researchers. Likert scores were applied to describe the situation of HTA knowledge translation. Rank-sum test was conducted to compare the differences. Results: While the differences in research utilization were not statistical significant, some significant differences were found between researchers from university and researchers not from university in the aspects of organizational knowledge translation support, research uptake process, cognition of knowledge translation, output forms of research outcomes, quality of HTA research. Conclusion: It is recommended to establish the knowledge translation support mechanism for HTA research outcomes, strengthen the collaborations and communications between HTA researchers and policy-makers, promote their cognition of HTA knowledge translation in the process of decision-making, and adopt various output forms of research outcomes more appropriately and effectively.