首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例
引用本文:赵 静,接雅俐,杜志波.基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(6):499-501.
作者姓名:赵 静  接雅俐  杜志波
作者单位:1. 江苏省老年医学研究所《实用老年医学》编辑部,江苏南京,210024
2. 南京医科大学学报编辑部,江苏南京,210029
基金项目:江苏省科技期刊研究基金项目(JKQJXB023;JKQJXB001)
摘    要:选择基金资助论文作为高水平论文,对其被引用情况进行分析,同时与无基金资助论文的被引情况进行比较,以探讨二者被引情况存在的差异.结果表明,被引用过的基金资助论文的单篇被引频次并不比无基金资助论文高,而基金资助论文的被引率显著高于无基金资助论文.由此可见,论文的引用率可推广应用于表示期刊的水平.

关 键 词:基金资助  被引频次  被引率
收稿时间:2012/11/14 0:00:00

Analysis of differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers in some high-level medical journals
ZHAO Jing,JIE Ya-li and DU Zhi-bo.Analysis of differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers in some high-level medical journals[J].Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing(Social Science),2012,12(6):499-501.
Authors:ZHAO Jing  JIE Ya-li and DU Zhi-bo
Institution:1(1.Editorial Department of Practical Geriatrics,Jiangsu Province Geriatric Institute,Nanjing 210024;2.Editorial Department of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
Abstract:This article chose funded papers as high-level papers,analyzed the citations of these papers,and investigated the differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers. The results suggested that there was no difference in citation frequency of single paper between funded papers and non-funded papers,while there was significant difference in citation rate between funded papers and non-funded papers. It could be got that citation rate of papers may be used to reflect the levels of journals.
Keywords:fund  citation frequency  citation rate
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号