首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

老子不是太史儋考证
引用本文:李水海.老子不是太史儋考证[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,1(2):29-34.
作者姓名:李水海
作者单位:江南大学,文学院,江苏,无锡,214063
摘    要:古今一些学者,将老子老聃混同于太史儋,荆门郭店楚墓 竹简《老子》出土后,又有某些学者宣扬“老子太史儋同一人”论。本文详尽考证了太史儋 其人其事及其思想特征,证实他是活动于战国中期的具有历史循环论思想的东周王朝一个史 官,与主要活动于春秋晚期至战国初期的道家创始人老子老聃绝非一人,确论他们是不同时 代、不同学术和思想特征、不同姓氏祖先、不同名字并不同身世事迹的两个人。

关 键 词:老子老聃  太史儋  秦献公  谶语  历史循环论
文章编号:1671-6973(2002)02-0029-06
修稿时间:2001年10月8日

Textual Research on Identity of Lao Zi
LI Shui-hai.Textual Research on Identity of Lao Zi[J].Journal of Southern Yangtze University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition,2002,1(2):29-34.
Authors:LI Shui-hai
Abstract:It was commonly known that Lao Zi was the historian Zhang,which was strengthened by the unearthing of LaoZi,a bamboo book from Guodian,Jingmen.After an exhaustive study of Zhang in his idea and life,the paper proves that he was a historian in the middle Warring States Period,who up held the idea that history goes backward.He is not Lao Zi,whose activities were in the late period.They belonged to different periods with different ideas and a cademy.What's more,they didn't share the same name and activities and were born into families of different social class.
Keywords:Lao Zi  historian Zhang  King of Qin State  prophecy  history in a circle
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号