首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

制定法与判例法的比较及确立刑事判例补充制度的可行性
引用本文:李晓明.制定法与判例法的比较及确立刑事判例补充制度的可行性[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,2(2):144-146.
作者姓名:李晓明
作者单位:苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215000
摘    要:目前学术界对我国是否可确立刑事判例制度争论甚大,甚至两种观点截然对立.文章通过对制定法与判例法的优劣比较研究,尤其是基于目前两大法系新近出现的趋于融合的纵深分析,加之我国刑事司法实际工作的需要,笔者认为目前在我国确立刑事判例补充制度,不仅必要而且完全可行.并提出应建立具有我国社会主义特点的刑事判例制度体系.

关 键 词:制定法  判例法  刑事判例  补充制度
文章编号:1009-5926(2001)02-0144-03
修稿时间:2001年3月15日

Contrast between Positive Law and Case Law and the Possibility of the Establishment of Complementary System of Criminal Judicial Practice
LI Xiao-ming.Contrast between Positive Law and Case Law and the Possibility of the Establishment of Complementary System of Criminal Judicial Practice[J].Journal of Southern Yangtze University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition,2001,2(2):144-146.
Authors:LI Xiao-ming
Abstract:At present, there's a hot debate on the feasibility of criminal case judicial system in China. The two schools concerned seem to be contradictory in every aspect. However, this paper finds a new trend in the combination of two schools. After the compare between the positive law and case law in advantages and disadvantages, this paper advocate that it be necessary and possible to establish the complementary system to the positive law, in order to meet the meeds of the judicial practice in our country. Furthermore, it points out that the system of case law should be characteristic.
Keywords:positive law  case law  criminal judicial practice  complementary system
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号