首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

行政不作为及其责任体系
引用本文:张忠.行政不作为及其责任体系[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,9(2):26-32.
作者姓名:张忠
作者单位:福州大学,公共管理学院,福建,福州,350108
基金项目:福建省教育厅社会科学研究项目 
摘    要:界定不作为有存在论和规范论两种基本进路,在现代法治语境下,从规范论的角度,行政不作为较为合理的定义应为:行政主体负有法定的作为义务且能够履行而未履行或拖延履行的行政行为。着眼于有效规制行政不作为行为以及构建行政不作为的责任体系,对于行政不作为可以区隔为抽象行政不作为和具体行政不作为、中请行政之行政不作为和职权行政之行政不作为两种主要的对应分类。道义责任、政治责任和法律责任构成行政不作为责任体系的三种基本类型,其中行政不作为的法律责任包括行政责任、赔偿责任和刑事责任三种具体形式。

关 键 词:行政不作为  道义责任  政治责任  法律责任

Administrative Omission and Its Responsibility System
ZHANG Zhong.Administrative Omission and Its Responsibility System[J].Journal of Southern Yangtze University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition,2010,9(2):26-32.
Authors:ZHANG Zhong
Institution:ZHANG Zhong (Public Administration School,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
Abstract:There are two basic approaches to define administrative omission,and they are existence theory and normative theory.From the perspective of normative theory and in the context of modern law,administrative omission can be more reasonably defined as:the administrative body having a statutory obligation to fulfill the duty within its capacity doesn't perform or delay performing.In order to effectively regulate administrative omission and establish the responsibility system to reduce administrative omission,adm...
Keywords:Administrative Omission  Moral Responsibility  Political Responsibility  Legal Responsibility  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号