首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司马迁与班固眼中的司马相如--两汉文人的价值观演化之管窥
引用本文:蒋方,张忠智.司马迁与班固眼中的司马相如--两汉文人的价值观演化之管窥[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,30(3):50-53.
作者姓名:蒋方  张忠智
作者单位:1. 湖北大学,人文学院,湖北,武汉,430062
2. 台湾远东技术学院,台湾,台南
摘    要:从<史记>与<汉书>中关于司马相如的记载来看,班固作<司马相如传>虽然基本上是<史记>的照录,但他对相如的评价与司马迁并不相同.司马迁认为相如赋虽多虚辞滥说,但功在讽谏,合于<诗>道;班固则否认相如赋的讽谏功用,尽管如此,他却认为靡丽文章也有传名后世的价值.两人对相如的不同评价反映了两汉文人价值观念的演化.<史记@司马相如传>是第一篇以辞赋作品为主体的史传,而将司马相如视为文学家而立传者则是班固.

关 键 词:司马迁  班固  司马相如  文人价值观
文章编号:1001-4799(2003)03-0050-04
修稿时间:2002年9月24日

Sima-qian, Ban Gu and Sima-xiang ru——Restricted Review on the Valuable Point of Scholar-Officals of Western and Eastern Han
JIANG Fang,ZHANG Zhong-zhi.Sima-qian, Ban Gu and Sima-xiang ru——Restricted Review on the Valuable Point of Scholar-Officals of Western and Eastern Han[J].Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2003,30(3):50-53.
Authors:JIANG Fang  ZHANG Zhong-zhi
Abstract:Comparing (Han Shu) with (Shi Ji), although Ban Gu almost copied (Sima-xiang yu Zhuang) from Sima-qiang, he had a different appraisement. Sima-qian appreciated the critical function of the "fu" written by Sima-xiang ru and pointed out that extravagant in words was its shortcoming. Ban Gu negated the functioning critics of Sima-xiang ru's work and considered that xiang ru's "fu" with the characteristics of extravagant in words was still valuable. The different views of the two historians is a reflection of the evolution of the scholar-officials' valuable-point during Western and Eastern Han. Sima-qian is the first historian who makes a biography of Sima-xiang ru and Ban Gu takes xiang ru as a literary and art scholar-official in his historical work.
Keywords:Sima-qian  Ban Gu  Sima-xiang ru  the scholar-officials  valuable-point  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号