| 《老残游记》非谴责小说论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王学钧.《老残游记》非谴责小说论[J].南京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,17(4):20-24. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王学钧 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏省社会科学院,文学研究所,江苏,南京,210094 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2003年度国家社会科学基金03BZW038项目中间成果。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自鲁迅将《老残游记》纳入谴责小说后,便经代代承传,如今已成常识。本文论证,鲁迅在具体的论述中其实并不能按自己的一般论式将谴责小说概念推广到《老残游记》,反而对之作了与贬义性的谴责小说概念相反的赞誉性肯定,落入自相矛盾。这是因为《老残游记》并不是鲁迅所定义的那种谴责小说。
|
| 关 键 词： | 鲁迅 刘鹗 《老残游记》 谴责小说 |
Travels of Lao Tsan:Nota Condemnation Novel |
| |
| WANG Xue-jun.Travels of Lao Tsan:Nota Condemnation Novel[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology(Social Science),2004,17(4):20-24. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Xue-jun |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Xue-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | It a is accepted by one after one generation since Lu Xun defined Travels of Lao Tsan as condemnation novel. Now it is already common sense that Travels of Lao Tsan is a condemnation novel. The condemnation novel is a derogatory term. This paper demonstrates that Lu Xun couldnt apply his concept of condemnation novel to Travels of Lao Tsan. On the contrary, he gave commendatory words on the novel which is opposite to the concept of condemnation novel and self-contradictory. The reason lies in the fact that Travels of Lao Tsan is not a typical condemnation novel as Lu xun defined. |
| |
| Keywords: | Lu Xun Liu E Travels of Lao Tsan condemnation novel |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
