中国哲学研究方法论的再反思——"援西入中"及其两种模式

20世纪以来作为现代学科意义上的"中国哲学",在引入西方哲学的观念资源来诠释和建构现代中国哲学的意义上,其基本的研究模式与其使用"反向格义"来指称,不如以"援西入中"来描述。西方哲学"援入"中国哲学研究的正、负两种模式各具特点,效果亦不相同。对于作为一门"比较哲学"的现代"中国哲学"来说,西方哲学不仅不是"负担",反而是"资源"。中国哲学当下和将来发展的必由之路不应当是"去西方哲学化",其诠释和建构恰恰需要与西方哲学甚至整个人文学科的深度互动。如此才能真正避免那种"以西解中"的"单向格义",从而在"以中为主"的"中西双向互诠"中建立中国哲学自身的主体性。

Re-pondering on the Methodology of Studies in Chinese Philosophy——"Introducing the West into the Chinese" and Its Two Patterns

Since the 20th century,Western philosophy has been employed as conceptual resources in the effort to transform Chinese philosophy into what is called a modern discipline.The approach involved is to be better described as yuanxi ruzhong(introduction of Western philosophy into Chinese philosophy)than as fanxiang geyi(reverse analogical interpretation).The employment of Western philosophical concepts can be both positive and negative,with respective characteristics and contradictory effects.To modern Chinese philosophy(being a comparative philosophy),Western philosophy is resources rather than a burden.The present and future developments in Chinese philosophy can never be found in the elimination of Western elements in modern Chinese philosophy,but in the profound interaction between Chinese philosophy and its Western counterpart or even the total field of Western humanities.Only in this way can yixi jiezhong(one-way interpretation of Chinese traditional texts in Western philosophical discourse)be truly avoided,so to achieve the genuine autonomy of Chinese philosophy on the basis of yizhong weizhu(interpretation mainly in Chinese philosophical discourse)and zhongxi shuangxiang huquan(mutual interpretation of Western and Chinese philosophies).