骚、赋文体辨——兼说屈作不当名赋

本文认为 ,骚、赋分别为不同的文体 ,不应混为一谈 ,屈原之作不当以赋名之。文章着重从骚、赋产生的历史状况 ,骚、赋体性之差别 ,骚、赋之流变 ,说明二者之不同 ,其中对骚、赋体性之别论述较为具体细微。文章最后对与此相关的几个问题 ,如刘勰、萧统对骚、赋的分辨 ,汉人何以称屈作为赋 ,以及骚体赋进行了简要论述。此文有助于解决对屈原之作称名混乱的状况

Differences between Shao and Fu

The paper proposes that Shao, rhyme prose, and Fu, poetic prose, were two different styles and should be differentiated from each other and that the works of QU Yuan, a famous patriotic Chu poet, should not be called as Fu. The paper attempts to differentiate the two through investigating the different situations in which they originated from, their different stylistic characteristics and the different ways of evolution. The paper also briefly discussed several related issues, such as how LIU Xie and XIAO Tong, who lived during the Shui Dynasty (?year to year?) distinguished the two and why intellectuals during Hang Dynasty called QU Yuan's works as Fu. The paper helps clarify the right name for QU Yuan's works.