首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

当场劫持人质索要财物问题定罪研究
引用本文:魏超.当场劫持人质索要财物问题定罪研究[J].山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(12):1238-1243.
作者姓名:魏超
作者单位:南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210000
摘    要:绑架罪是单行为犯,故建立在复行为犯学说基础上的索取财物及是否存在"近亲属般切身忧虑者",都不是绑架罪与抢劫罪的界限。只要当场劫持人质,无论是索要财物还是提出不法要求,都应当以绑架罪定罪。当场劫持人质行为对人质的人身安全侵害可能性比典型的绑架罪要轻。绑架罪的社会危害性还体现在其所带来的社会负面效应,即群众所产生的恐惧心理。

关 键 词:绑架罪  抢劫罪  当场  法益侵害

Study on the Conviction of on-spot Asking for Property from the Hostage
WEI Chao.Study on the Conviction of on-spot Asking for Property from the Hostage[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition,2014(12):1238-1243.
Authors:WEI Chao
Institution:WEI Chao (Law School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210000, China)
Abstract:Kidnapping is a crime,so asking for property is related with " close relatives like personal cares" or not based on the theory of double crimes is not the boundary between kidnapping and robbery. As long as the spot hostage takes place,it is convicted kidnapping regardless of asking for property or posing illegal request. The safety violation of on- spot hostage is less than kidnapping. The harm of kidnapping to the society also displays its negative impacts on the society,that is the public fear.
Keywords:Kidnapping  Robbery  On the spot  Violating legal interests
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号