首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中韩行政革新的路径选择比较
引用本文:刘向晖,黄宗问.中韩行政革新的路径选择比较[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):87-92.
作者姓名:刘向晖  黄宗问
作者单位:1. 华北电力大学公共政策研究所,北京,102206
2. 中国社会科学院研究生院,北京,100102
摘    要:行政革新是现代各国政治体制改革和制度变迁过程中的有机组成部分。近年来,中国和韩国都在持续地开展一系列的行政革新运行。然而,就路径选择而言,两国却截然不同。“立法推动”成为韩国行政革新的重要推进机制,中国行政革新的实践则主要是以政策推动的方式完成的,此类政策虽然能够取得近似行政组织法的地位,但却表现出某种程度的随意性和多变性的不利方面。借鉴韩国等国家的经验,中国未来的宏观改革有待实现从政策之治向法治之治的转变。

关 键 词:行政革新  路径  政府组织法  政策
文章编号:1008-2603(2006)03-0087-06
修稿时间:2006年6月2日

A Comparative Study on Path-choosing of Administrative Reform in China and Korea
LIU Xiang-hui,HUANG Zong-wen.A Comparative Study on Path-choosing of Administrative Reform in China and Korea[J].Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences),2006(3):87-92.
Authors:LIU Xiang-hui  HUANG Zong-wen
Abstract:Administrative reform is an integral component of the process of political reform and institutional change in modern countries.China and Korea both launched a series of administrative reform movements in recent years.However,two countries made completely different choices in path_choosing.Korea developed its administrative reform by means of enacting laws,which has contributed a fairly high legitimacy to its reform and indicated the feature and advantage of high stability.Different from Korea's path_choosing,China promoted administrative reform by means of making policies.Although they can achieve a status analogous to Administrative Organic Law,these kinds of policies are far from having enough seriousness and authority,as a result,there exist nature and disadvantages of random and uncertainty in the process of administrative reform in China.Through profiting from the experiences of Korea and other counties,China is to take action to accomplish the transformation from rule of policy to rule by law in near future' s macro_reform.
Keywords:administrative reform  path-choosing  Administrative Organic Law  policy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号