|
|||||
|
|
| 进退两难:相对不起诉制度之博弈分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 彭志刚,黄河,李长兵.进退两难:相对不起诉制度之博弈分析[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,40(4). |
| 作者姓名： | 彭志刚 黄河 李长兵 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国社会科学院,法学所,北京,100732 2. 江西省高级人民法院,江西,南昌,330046 3. 北京师范大学,法学院,北京,100875 |
| 摘 要： | 相对不起诉制度是我国1996年修改后的<刑事诉讼法>对检察机关免予起诉制度废除后的产物.从10余年的司法实践过程来看,相对不起诉在检察机关应用较少,主要是体现了检察权对审判权的谦抑.从该制度最初的功能设计分析,相对不起诉是为处理刑事案件作适当分流而设计的,它应该是解决刑事案件中利益冲突的途径之一.长期的实践表明,该制度面临着许多矛盾,这些矛盾导致相对不起诉制度处于一个进退两难的境地.因此,从保护被害人权利来说,完善相对不起诉制度,使之成为刑事案件中利益冲突解决的正式途径,应该是新的刑事诉讼修改的一个重要内容. |
| 关 键 词： | 相对不起诉 刑事案件 利益冲突 被害人权利 |
A Dilemma:Analysis of the Relative Non-Prosecution System |
|
| PENG Zhi-gang,HUANG He,LI Chang-bing.A Dilemma:Analysis of the Relative Non-Prosecution System[J].Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2009,40(4). | |
| Authors: | PENG Zhi-gang HUANG He LI Chang-bing |
| Institution: | 1.Institute of Law;Chinese Academy of Social Sciences;Beijing 100732;China;2.Higher People's Court of Jiangxi Province;Nanchang 330046;3.School of Law;Beijing Normal University;Beijing 100875;China |
| Abstract: | The relative non-prosecution system was the product of the Criminal Procedure Law amended in 1996,in which the prosecutorial organs' authority to make "exemption from prosecution" decisions was abolished.In the past 10 years' judicial practice,relative non-prosecution has not often been used in prosecutorial organs,which manifests both the respect for and check of trial authority from the prosecutorial organs.The system was originally designed to properly allocate the treatment of criminal cases and should ... |
| Keywords: | relative non-prosecution criminal cases conflicts of interests rights of victims |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |