| 《儒林外史》和《围城》讽刺艺术比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈彪.《儒林外史》和《围城》讽刺艺术比较[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,15(5):99-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈彪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽水利水电职业技术学院,基础部,安徽,合肥,230601 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《儒林外史》和《围城》是中国讽刺小说发展史上的两座高峰,本文对二者讽刺艺术不同的内涵和艺术成就进行了比较。文章认为《,儒林外史》的讽刺对象直指社会制度和社会风气《;围城》则揭示了人性的根本颓败与人类的生存困境,而将道德判断延期《。儒林外史》的讽刺采用客观呈现的叙事方法,而《围城》的讽刺则采用主观说明的叙事方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《儒林外史》 《围城》 讽刺艺术 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-2463(2006)05-0099-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月26日 |
A Comparison of Satiring Art Between Scholars and Fortress Besieged |
| |
| CHEN Biao.A Comparison of Satiring Art Between Scholars and Fortress Besieged[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition),2006,15(5):99-101. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Biao |
| |
| Institution: | Basic Course Department, Anhui Technical College of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Power |
| |
| Abstract: | Scholars and Fortress Besieged both are the models of satiring fictions, which have comparable satiring methods in fictions. This paper holds that the objects of satire in Scholars are social system and fations.However, Fortress Besieged has proclaimed the decadence of humanity and living predicament of human. Scholars has adopted objective narrating methods; but Fortress Besieged has adopted subjective narrating methods. |
| |
| Keywords: | Scholars Fortress Besieged satiring art comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
