首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

电子文献资源的稳定性与权威性研究——以史学写作为例
引用本文:刘,博.电子文献资源的稳定性与权威性研究——以史学写作为例[J].江汉大学学报(人文科学版),2013(6):86-93.
作者姓名:  
作者单位:中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院,北京100007
摘    要:电子资源具有使用设备和技术更新换代快、存储和阅读性能不稳定的特点。虽然电子资源有不少优点.但用于史学写作时一定要加以甄别。其学术参考价值取决于发行人、制作技术、流通途径、载体和格式。历史学电子文献引证标注参考有不同标准,具体问题需具体对待,慎重参考和引证电子文献。有些来源自网络的电子文献无需标注网址,需要引用网址的电子公报最好截图保存,以防止下次无法访问。我国与西方在历史学电子文献方面有差距,仍有巨大发展空间,主要表现在史学电子文献开发程度和使用的普及程度低。

关 键 词:电子文献  著录规范  史学写作  引证标注  参考文献

Studies on Stability and Authoritativeness of Electronic Resources in Historiography
LIU Bo.Studies on Stability and Authoritativeness of Electronic Resources in Historiography[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Education,2013(6):86-93.
Authors:LIU Bo
Institution:LIU Bo ( National Institute of International Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100007, China)
Abstract:The characteristic of electronic sources is that the operating device and technology up- dates frequently, with unstable performance in storage and use. Their academic value of reference de- pends on their issuer, the production technology, distribution channels, carriers and formats. There are several different standards of cited references of electronic document in China' s practice of history study, each must be treated with specific academic norm requirement. Some sources of electronic documents from the Web need not cite URLs, and to those electronic bulletin which need cite URLs, it would be best to save the screenshot, to prevent the next inaccessible. There is a gap between China and the West in the electronic sources of history study, and there is still huge room for development, mainly in the low level of development and use of electronic historical literature.
Keywords:electronic literature  cataloging norms  historian writing  cited mark  references
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号