如何看待“核心期刊”和“论文学术水平”

“核心期刊”的概念20世纪80年代传入中国以来,其实际效用从原有的参考工具书被衍生为职称评定、学术评定,甚至学位评定的门槛值。使真正的“论文学术水平”与“核心期刊”的概念混淆起来。本文试图从对这两个概念的论述入手,建议中国学术期刊管理部门成立专门的评定期刊学术水平的机构,从而有助于促进中国学术期刊的学术质量得到真正的发展。

On Core Periodicals and the Quality of Academic Paper

Since the introduction of the concept "core periodicals" into China in the 1980s, the actual function of periodicals has been changed from a reference to a threshold for post evaluation, academic assessment and even degree assessment. The concept of "quality of academic paper" has been mixed with that of "core periodicals". This article attempts to discuss this confusion from these two concepts, in the hope of urging the management department at China Academic Periodicals to establish an organization that is dedicated to the evaluation of the quality of academic periodicals, so as to facilitate and ensure the true development of academic quality of academic periodicals in China.