法益抽象化、精神化问题的中国型塑

法益具有立法批判、解释机能,能够、应当、且需要存在。当前学界对法益抽象化、精神化之批判存在前提设置不当、循环论证及混淆对法益进行抽象化、精神化理解与刑法是否应保护某些抽象化、精神化法益的关系的问题。唯有完成法益抽象化、精神化问题的理性型塑,才能合理认知法益论,进而实现刑法处罚的正义化。即使刑法不当保护了某些抽象化、精神化法益,也只能证明法益的立法批判机能需要得到进一步发挥。若从外在形式与内在内容这两个层面上理解“抽象”与“具体”之意,则刑法法益的抽象化不止是个例,诸如侮辱罪、诽谤罪等罪名的正当化已然表明某些精神化法益值得刑法保护。

Chinese Model on Abstraction and Spirituality of Legalization

Legal benefits have the functions of legislative critique and explanation; they can, should, and need to exist. At present, the academia''s criticism of the abstraction and spirituality of legal interests has the problems of improper premise, circular argumentation and abstraction of legal interest, spiritual understanding and whether criminal law should protect the relationship between abstraction and spirituality. Only by completing the rational modeling of the legalization of abstraction and spirituality can we rationally understand the theory of legal interest and realize the justice of criminal law punishment. Even if the criminal law improperly protects certain abstract and spiritual benefits, it can only prove that the legal criticism function of legal interests needs to be further developed. If the meanings of "abstract" and "concrete" are understood from two levels-external form and internal content, the abstraction of criminal law benefits is not the only case. Legitimacy of crimes such as insult and defamation has already shown that certain spiritual benefits are worthy of criminal law protection.