首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“致良知”“破我执”和唯意志论——梁启超和章太炎伦理思想比较之三
引用本文:彭平一.“致良知”“破我执”和唯意志论——梁启超和章太炎伦理思想比较之三[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),1999(3).
作者姓名:彭平一
作者单位:株洲师范专科学校!湖南株洲412007
摘    要::梁启超将“性善论”与阳明“心学”结合 ,提出了“致良知”的道德修养论。他对王阳明“知行合一”的观点进行了新的解释。章太炎则将“性恶论”、进化论和佛教法相唯识宗的有关理论揉合成具有浓厚宗教色彩的道德修养论。他把道德修养视为“破我执” ,并提出了“依自不依他”的道德原则。两者的道德修养论都具有“唯意志论”的倾向 ,而章太炎则表现得更加明显

关 键 词:道德修养论  梁启超  章太炎  “致良知”  “破我执”  唯意志论

“Innate Knowledge”,“Destroying Self-Concept” and Voluntarism
Peng Pingyi.“Innate Knowledge”,“Destroying Self-Concept” and Voluntarism[J].Journal of Jishou University(Social Science),1999(3).
Authors:Peng Pingyi
Abstract:By integrating the “theory of innate goodness” with Master Yangming′s “theory of mind”,Liang Qichao advanced his own “innate knowledge” as the theory of moral cultivation.He gave a new explanation to Wang Shouren′s theory of “agreement between knowledge and action.” On the other hand,Zhang Taiyan integrated the “theory of innate evil”,the theory of evolution and the theory of Buddhist Vijnaptimatrata School into his own theory of moral cultivation with a strong religious colour .He held that moral cultivation means to “destroy self-concept” and advanced the moral principle of “obeying autonomy instead of heteronomy”.Both Liang′s and Zhang′s theories are voluntaristic but the latter appears to be the more obvious.
Keywords:theory of moral cultivation  Liang Qichao  Zhang Taiyan  “innate knowledge”  “Destroying self-concept”  voluntarism
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号