首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论单位、团体内部纠纷的自律性处理与民事审判权的界限
引用本文:廖永安.论单位、团体内部纠纷的自律性处理与民事审判权的界限[J].湘潭大学学报,2005,29(5):74-78.
作者姓名:廖永安
作者单位:湘潭大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
基金项目:国家社科基金项目:民事审判权作用范围研究(05CFX023)。
摘    要:法院审判权能否作用于单位、团体内部纠纷是近年诉讼法学理论界一个比较困惑的问题。从现代西方国家发展趋势来看,随着民主法治观念日益深入人心,法院审判权正逐步扩大对单位、团体内部纠纷与争议的处理。具体就我们国家而言,民事审判权也有进一步扩大对单位、团体内部纠纷与争议处理的必要,但同时应遵循以下原则:第一、技术事项例外原则;第二、用尽团体组织内部救济原则;第三、合法有效的仲裁条款排除司法管辖原则。

关 键 词:内部纠纷  自律性  民事审判权  特别权力关系
文章编号:1001-5981(2005)05-0074-05
修稿时间:2005年7月1日

On the Boundary between Self-disciplining Disposition to Inner Disputes of Enterprises or Communities and Civil Jurisdiction
LIAO Yong-an.On the Boundary between Self-disciplining Disposition to Inner Disputes of Enterprises or Communities and Civil Jurisdiction[J].Journal Of XIANGTAN University:Philosophy And Social Sciences,2005,29(5):74-78.
Authors:LIAO Yong-an
Abstract:It is a puzzle in the academic domain of procedure law in recent years whether jurisdiction of court can act on the internal disputes of enterprises and communities or not.With the development of law in the modern western countries,the idea of democracy and law increasingly permeates into every aspect of people's life.Jurisdiction of court is further enlarged to handle the internal disputes and dissensions of enterprises and communities.Take China for example,it is necessary to widen civil jurisdiction to handle the internal disputes and dissensions of enterprises and communities whereas the following principles should be observed: First,technological item is exceptional;second,the principle of exerting internal relief in the group;third,legal and effective arbitral clauses exclude judicial domination.
Keywords:inner-dispute  self-disciplining  civil jurisdiction  relations of special privilege
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号