经、史视域中的宋代《春秋》学

《春秋》虽列于经部，实则兼具经学与史学的双重性质。从汉代经学初立，《春秋》学与政治联姻，因而为经的性质十分明显。从杜预至刘知几，《春秋》为史的观念被推向了极致，中唐啖助学派始视《春秋》具有经、史舍一的性质，这一观点在宋儒那里得到了充分发挥。虽然宋儒在承认《春秋》具有双重性质这一点上并无异议，但在对待经、史具体关系上却又有所差异，孙复、刘敞为尊经贬传的代表，苏辙与朱熹则为以史证经和以史通经的代表，这些争论既反映了《春秋》学的发展脉络，亦体现了经、史之学的历史姻缘。

Study of the Spring and Autumn Annals in Song Dynasty from the perspective of Confusion classics and history

The Spring and Autumn Annals,though included in the category of Confucian classics,is also a history book. Since official status was given to Confucianism in Han Dynasty,the Spring and Autumn Annals was related to politics and taken as a Confucian classics. Then,from Du Yu to Liu Zhiji,the book was widely taken as a history one. Dan Zhu and his followers in the middle of Tang Dynasty began to regard it as both a Confucian classics and a history book,which was further developed by scholars in Song Dynasty,th...