首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刘心武先生"揭秘"秦可卿之误浅议
引用本文:蔡觉敏.刘心武先生"揭秘"秦可卿之误浅议[J].湛江师范学院学报,2006,27(2):56-59.
作者姓名:蔡觉敏
作者单位:北京大学,中文系,北京,100871
摘    要:刘心武先生“揭秘”后的秦可卿,存在着诸多矛盾。之所以如此,是因为其“揭秘”过程存在如下问题:一是对文本语句理解的绝对化;二是在以“史实”论证的过程中,其“史实”全凭一己之见,而其“论证”的过程也以主观推测为主;三是对秦可卿的理解是从印象出发,不顾及《红楼梦》整体思想与她在全书中的作用。刘心武先生对《红楼梦》和秦可卿“揭秘”,实则是不顾其作为小说的艺术特点,消除了其伟大意义。

关 键 词:秦可卿  《红楼梦》  史实  艺术性
文章编号:1006-4702(2006)02-0056-04
收稿时间:2006-03-05
修稿时间:2006年3月5日

A Discussion of Liu Xinwu's Mistake in "Revealing the Secrets of Qin Keqing"
CAI Jue-min.A Discussion of Liu Xinwu''''s Mistake in "Revealing the Secrets of Qin Keqing"[J].Journal of Zhanjiang Normal College,2006,27(2):56-59.
Authors:CAI Jue-min
Abstract:Qin Keqing in A Dream of Red Mansions as "revealed" by Liu Xinwu is full of contradictions due to the following problems in Liu's process of "revealing the secrets".First,Liu shows strong absolutism in reading the novel.Second,many "historical facts"that Liu showed us is out of his imagination and his explanation and proof is subjective.Third,his understanding of Qin Keqing is out of his subjective impression,not viewing the novel as a whole.In fact,Liu's "revealing the secrets" of Qin Keqing and The Dream of Red Mansion ignores its artistic value as a novel and eliminates its great significance as such.
Keywords:Qin Keqing  A Dream of Red Mansions  historical facts  artistry
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号