| 行政国家的危机治理——9·11恐怖袭击和2008年金融危机 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 艾立克·A.波斯纳,亚德连·佛缪勒.行政国家的危机治理——9·11恐怖袭击和2008年金融危机[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,47(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 艾立克·A.波斯纳 亚德连·佛缪勒 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 芝加哥大学,法学院,美国;哈佛大学,法学院,美国 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 9·11恐怖袭击和2008年金融危机中,美国政府的危机治理和危机立法有相似的表现:宽泛的政治过程而非宪法上的限制等因素在两次事件中都发挥着作用,产生了相似的危机治理模式;在这一模式中,国会向行政部门赋予强大的新的权力。这一模式通过卡尔·施密特关于立法的理论得到更好的解释,更优于麦迪逊理论。但在危机政治的广泛制约因素中,布什政府在9·11之后比在金融危机中对其权力的攫取更加激进。这一方面是因为布什政府在2001—2008年间逐步丧失了其公信力和群众的拥护,另一方面也是由于金融监管体制的分裂局面。
|
| 关 键 词： | 危机治理 危机立法 施密特观点 麦迪逊观点 自由裁量权 |
Crisis Governance in the Administrative State:9/11 and the Financial Meltdown of 2008 |
| |
| Eric A.Posner,Adrian Vermeulet.Crisis Governance in the Administrative State:9/11 and the Financial Meltdown of 2008[J].Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2010,47(6). |
| |
| Authors: | Eric APosner Adrian Vermeulet |
| |
| Institution: | Eric A.Posner,Adrian Vermeulet(School of Law,University of Chicago,America,School of Law,Harvard University,America) |
| |
| Abstract: | This Article compares crisis governance and emergency lawmaking after 9.11 and the financial meltdown of 2008.We argue that the two episodes were broadly similar in outline,but importantly different in detail,and we attempt to explain both the similarities and differences.First,broad political processes,rather than legal or constitutional constraints,operated in both episodes to create a similar pattern of crisis governance,in which Congress delegated large new powers to the executive.We argue that this pat... |
| |
| Keywords: | crisis governance emergency lawmaking Schmitt view Madison view discretion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
