| “义理”、“考据”辨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王小婷.“义理”、“考据”辨[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(3):144-151. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王小婷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学文史哲研究院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2010年山东省博士后创新项目“中国传统经学方法论研究”的部分成果,编号:201003089 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "义理"、"考据"二词原非一对范畴,造成其在几个向度上的区别并不具有无条件的一致性。"考据"指利用文献资料所做的专题研究,"义理"起初泛指各种社会行为准则和观念,虽可以简驭繁,但比天人性命具体。二者转为一对范畴是初始涵义、经学逻辑以及认知策略等多重因素造成的。在文本诠释领域,"义理"原与"文章"、"章句"相对,后者接近于经书本文。经书"本文"而非经书中适合考据的内容,代表着经学诠释中"殊相"、"部分"的一极;"义理"、"考据"都围绕本文展开,考据活动的共相性取向由此彰显。在一个五要素的文本诠释理论模型中,考据活动足以与阅读活动等价,所以存在"关于义理问题的考据"。
|
| 关 键 词： | 经学诠释理论 义理考据 汉学宋学 戴震 方东树 |
Discrimination between Universal Truth and Textological Study |
| |
| Wang Xiaoting.Discrimination between Universal Truth and Textological Study[J].Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2011(3):144-151. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Xiaoting |
| |
| Institution: | Wang Xiaoting(Institute of Literature,History and Philosophy,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The two terms of universal truth and textological study originally did not form a pair of category,therefore,their discriminative dimensions failed to be unconditionally in agreement with each other.At first,textological study referred to a study on a specific topic using the concerning literature,while universal truth referred to the norms and ideas of social conduct.Though people could deal with infinite things according to these finite rules,universal truth was much more specific than philosophy.The two ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Confucian classics hermeneutics universal truth and textological study the Han School and the Song School Dai Zhen |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
