首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

商标授权确权中的混淆可能性判断研究
引用本文:冯晓青,夏君丽.商标授权确权中的混淆可能性判断研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):139-147.
作者姓名:冯晓青  夏君丽
作者单位:(1. 中国政法大学 民商经济法学院,北京 100088;2.最高人民法院知识产权庭,北京 100745)
摘    要:我国商标注册申请的审查与注册商标的无效宣告是否需要以混淆可能性作为驳回申请或者无效宣告的判断标准是一个值得讨论的问题。在商标授权确权问题上,虽然相关法律并未明确规定混淆可能性要件,但从商标注册、商标使用与侵权救济制度的一致性、商标法精神与立法宗旨的角度考量,应当坚持混淆可能性标准。我国商标授权确权行政审查与司法实践也在遵循这一思路。在混淆可能性判断时,应当借鉴司法解释提出的混淆可能性作为参考因素,坚持个案判断。

关 键 词:商标授权确权  混淆可能性  类似商品  近似商标  不正当竞争

Research on the Determination of Possibility of Confusion in the Authorization and Affirmation of a Trademark
FENG Xiao-qing,XIA Jun-li.Research on the Determination of Possibility of Confusion in the Authorization and Affirmation of a Trademark[J].Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences),2018(6):139-147.
Authors:FENG Xiao-qing  XIA Jun-li
Abstract:It is worth discussing whether the examination of the trademark registration application in China and the invalidation of the registered trademark needs to use the possibility of confusion as the criterion for judging the application for rejection or invalidation. Regarding the issue of trademark authorization, though the relevant laws do not clearly stipulate the possibility of confusion, they should be regarded as confusing potential standards from the perspective of consistency of trademark registration, trademark use and infringement relief systems, trademark law spirit, as well as legislative purposes. The administrative review and judicial practice of China''s trademark authorization and authorization also follow this line of thought. When obscuring the possibility of judgment, reference should be made to the considerations of possibility of confusion and reference factors put forward by the judicial interpretation, and to insist on case judgment.
Keywords:trademark authorization and affirmation  possibility of confusion  similar goods  similar trademarks  unfair competition
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号