首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"最终解释权"剖析
引用本文:刘期安."最终解释权"剖析[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,13(2):107-112.
作者姓名:刘期安
作者单位:成都理工大学,成都,610051
摘    要:诸多商家在认定自己享有"最终解释权"的前提下推出了诸多促销活动,并获得了一定的利益.但事实上,某些商家的行为在很大程度上违背了诚实守信原则和法律规定,严重污染了消费环境.应如何理解"最终解释权"?本文从事实和法理角度对此现象与本质、适用法律与法理进行阐析,从而得出结论:"最终解释权"应由司法机关依法解释.

关 键 词:最终解释权  诚实守信  司法机关
文章编号:1672-0539(2005)02-107-06
修稿时间:2004年10月18日

Analyze the Final Interpretation Right
LIU Qi-an.Analyze the Final Interpretation Right[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences,2005,13(2):107-112.
Authors:LIU Qi-an
Abstract:Many businessmen believe that they enjoy the final interpretation right to sales promotion and hold many sales activities to attain benefits. However, some businessmen breached the principle of honesty or certain law, thus stained the consumption market. How should we comprehend the final interpretation right? The article explains the essence, suitable laws and legal principles about the final interpretation right in sales promotions and concluds that the final interpretation right should belong to judicial organs.
Keywords:the final interpretation right  honesty and sincereness  judicial organs
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号