| 郭正域《文选》评点浅论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵俊玲.郭正域《文选》评点浅论[J].重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版),2008,20(3):85-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵俊玲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学中文系 上海200433 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 复旦大学研究生创新基金资助. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 郭正域流传到今天的《文选》评本共有三种，它们之间内容都有出入，应皆是依当时流行的评本、又有所选择加工而成。作为较早的文人评本，郭正域的《文选》评点与出现于其前的书商操作评本有着质的差别，在《文选》评点学史上有着重大的价值与意义。在评点中，郭正域表达了对七子派主张的不满，明确提倡六朝文学，强调文学作品的“表情”作用。批评谢灵运作品的独特角度，则有补七子派一味以格调衡文之偏的重要意义。他的评点也提示着当代人对评点著作应给予更多的关注，以免造成文学批评史的遗珠之憾。
|
| 关 键 词： | 郭正域 《文选》评点 六朝文学 “表情” 谢灵运 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-8268(2008)03-0085-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2008年1月11日 |
On Guo Zhengyu's Comment on Wenxuan |
| |
| ZHAO Jun-ling.On Guo Zhengyu's Comment on Wenxuan[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition),2008,20(3):85-91. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Jun-ling |
| |
| Institution: | ZHAO Jun-ling(Chinese Department, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Guo Zhengyu had three versions about the comment on Wenxuan,which had a bit difference among them.They maybe came from the same version that populated at that time.Guo Zhengyu's comment on Wenxuan is meaningful,because it is an earlier literary version and is totally different from the version to business profit.Guo Zhengyu depressed his dissatisfaction to the revivalist and advocated the literature of the Six Dynasties.Furthermore,his comment on Xie Lingyun is very unique,which remedied the revivalist's insufficiencies. |
| |
| Keywords: | Guo Zhengyu comment on Wenxuan literature of the Six Dynasties depressing feelings Xie Lingyun |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
