首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论辩:现代汉语文论话语的重要方式
引用本文:向天渊.论辩:现代汉语文论话语的重要方式[J].新疆大学学报(社会科学版),2005,33(2):110-114.
作者姓名:向天渊
作者单位:西南师范大学中国新诗研究所 重庆400715
摘    要:胡适、陈独秀的"文学革命"论,点燃了围绕白话与文言展开的文学论争,论争的思维与言说方式凝结成现 代汉语文论至关重要的话语方式:论辩。论辩话语方式具有对话性、针对性、极端性三个显著特征。现代汉语语法的 系统性、词汇的口语化,以及梁启超的新文体、章士钊的逻辑文体、维新派与革命派进行的报刊大论战等多种因素, 共同培育了论辩话语方式。随着现代文学批评的展开与深入,论辩话语方式被煅造成一把典型的文论双刃剑。

关 键 词:论辩话语方式  对话性  针对性  极端性  文论双刃剑
文章编号:1000-2820(2005)02-0110-05
修稿时间:2004年11月26

Debate as an Important Means of Discourse of Literary Theory in Modern Chinese
XIANG Tian-yuan.Debate as an Important Means of Discourse of Literary Theory in Modern Chinese[J].Journal of Xinjiang University,2005,33(2):110-114.
Authors:XIANG Tian-yuan
Abstract:The debate between Hu Shi and Chen Duxie about literature and revolution triggered the literary debate on the vernacular and classical Chinese. The style of reasoning and speech was argumentative, which became the significant means of discourse in literary theory of modern Chinese. Being dialogical, direct and extreme were three distinctive features of the means of discourse of debate. It was cultivated by several factors, including the systematic feature of Modern Chinese grammar, colloquialism of vocabulary; Liang Qichao's new style, Zhang Shizhao's logic style and the debates on the newspapers between the reformers and revolutionaries. With the spread and deepening of modern literary criticism, debate, as a means of discourse, has become a typical sward of double blades for literary theory.
Keywords:debate as a means of discourse  dialogical  direct  extreme  sward of double blades for literary theory
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号