民事诉讼非法证据排除规则探析

2002年4月1日起施行的《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》标志着我国民事诉讼中的非法证据排除规则和判断标准得以正式确立。然而,实务中对该规则一直有所误解。目前,不论是英美法系国家,还是大陆法系国家,在立法和司法理论上都有不同的做法。在我国虽然立法上有禁止非法获取证据的规定,但对非法证据有无证明力则没有明确规定,这里有必要借鉴两大法系的做法,结合我国实际情况,以探讨如何建构我国非法证据排除规则。

On the Exclusion Rule of Illegal Evidence in Civil Litigation

The execution of "The rules about Illegal Evidence in Civil Litigation of Supreme People's Court" denoted the establishment of regulations and standards of the exclusion of illegal evidence formally.However,the misunderstanding always exists in the practice.Presently,both the legislation and legal theory differ in modus operandi between the law system of the Continent and the Anglo-American system.In our country,illegally obtained evidence legislatively is banned,but the ability to be proved of illegal evidence has not be defined specifically.To research how to establish the regulations of the exclusion of illegal evidence in our country,there is essentiality to take example by the modus operandi of the Two Law Systems,and to consider the present condition of our country.This essay analyses the connotation and value of the regulations of the exclusion of illegal evidence as well as the rules about illegal evidence in civil litigation in present legislation.Fianlly,the proposal about the fare-thee-well of the regulations of the exclusion of illegal evidence the is brought up.