| 道器之辨的逻辑发展 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王向清,李芬.道器之辨的逻辑发展[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,1(2):27-29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王向清 李芬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学哲学系,湖南,湘潭,411105 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 道器之辨是中国哲学史长期讨论的话题;道器之辨经历了道器本末未定论、道本器末论、器本道末论三个发展阶段;道本论强调要"以道御器",让器服从于道,服务于道;而器本论者认为道器不相分离,无形之道不能脱离有形之气。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道器 本末 形而上 形而下 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-9272(2007)02-0027-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年5月27日 |
Logical Development of the Distinction of Dao and Qi |
| |
| WANG Xiang-qing,LI fen.Logical Development of the Distinction of Dao and Qi[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology(Social Sciences),2007,1(2):27-29. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Xiang-qing LI fen |
| |
| Abstract: | The distinction of Dao and Qi(definite things) is a controversial theme in the history of philosophy. This distinction experiences three phases of indetermination of Dao as essence or as utilities, the phases of Dao as essence and Qi as utilities, the phases of Qi as essence and Dao as utilities. The doctrine of Dao as essence emphasizes that Qi must obey and serve Dao. But the doctrine of Qi as essence insists that Dao and Qi can never be separated. The immaterial Dao cannot be divorced from the material Qi. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dao and Qi essence and utilities the metaphysical the under-metaphysical |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
