论先实施暴力后临时起意取财行为的定性

对行为人先实施暴力行为后临时起意取财的行为该如何定性?理论上主要存在着"盗窃罪"与"抢劫罪"两种观点。最高院主张被害人尚未失去知觉时定为抢劫罪,被害人失去知觉或者死亡后定为盗窃罪。因为行为人先前暴力行为与后面取财行为具有关联性,所以应把二者结合在一起作为整体来评价。先前暴力行为与后面取财行为足以填充抢劫罪构成的客观方面,由手段行为(先前暴力行为的再利用)与目的行为(取财行为)构成完整的抢劫罪的实行行为。行为性质与被害人的状态无关,被害人的状态都是行为人先前暴力行为所直接导致的结果,不能因为被害人状态不同而做出不同的定性,而应将先实施暴力后临时起意取财行为统一定性为抢劫罪。

On Behavior’ Conviction of Foregoing Violence and Possessing Other’s Property with Abrupt Intention

When defendant’s foregoing violence results in victim’s losing consciousness or even death,the defendant might have an abrupt intention of possessing the other’s property.Generally speaking,there are two opinions in theory,crime of stealing and crime of robbery,on how to convict above-mentioned crime.The Supreme People’s Court maintains that the crime of robbery should be convicted when the victim had consciousness while the crime of stealing should be convicted when the victim had no consciousness or died.Violent behavior and possessing other’s property should be judged as the whole implementing behavior of robbery because they are correlative.What’s more,the violent behavior is the means of robbery.Victim’ status is inessential to the crime,so the judge should hold the opinion that the victim’ different status doesn’t change the nature of defendant’s robbery behavior.