首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

城乡融合发展与共同富裕:内涵、国际经验与实现路径
引用本文:陈志钢,茅锐,张云飞.城乡融合发展与共同富裕:内涵、国际经验与实现路径[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,52(7):68-78.
作者姓名:陈志钢  茅锐  张云飞
作者单位:浙江大学 中国农村发展研究院,浙江 杭州 310058
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD091);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71873119);教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目(19JHQ060);浙江大学—国际食物政策研究所国际发展联合研究中心项目;浙江大学仲英青年学者项目
摘    要:党的十八大以来,由于经济结构的调整以及社会主要矛盾的转化,中国经济发展进入了新的阶段,共同富裕这一目标愈受关注。由于中国长期执行城市偏向性的政策,城乡差距长期存在,阻碍了共同富裕目标的实现。党的十九大报告提出城乡融合发展这一新的理念,以解决城乡发展失衡的问题。城乡融合发展注重城乡之间的平等关系与要素的自由流动,在物质、权利、发展机会、精神和生态环境等维度上与共同富裕的内涵紧密联系。在共同富裕的目标下,针对农民权利、产业发展、收入分配、教育公平、生态价值转化、村际一体化发展等角度的政策路径将有效推动城乡融合发展。

关 键 词:共同富裕  城乡融合  城乡融合发展经济学  乡村发展  国际经验  
收稿时间:2021-11-29

Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Common Prosperity: Connotation,International Experience and Implementation Path
Chen Kevin,Mao Rui,Zhang Yunfei.Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Common Prosperity: Connotation,International Experience and Implementation Path[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2022,52(7):68-78.
Authors:Chen Kevin  Mao Rui  Zhang Yunfei
Institution:China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Abstract:Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China’s economic development has entered a new stage. Under the circumstances, the goal of “Common Prosperity” has attracted more and more attention over the past several years. China’s long-term implementation of urban-biased policies led to a huge gap between urban and rural areas for a long time and hindered the realization of common prosperity. The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward a new concept of “Integrated Urban-Rural Development” to solve the problem of unbalanced development between urban and rural areas. This study points out that integrated urban-rural development is an important path to achieve the goal of common prosperity due to the huge gap between urban and rural areas. Besides, narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas in various dimensions is also the main direction of common prosperity. Firstly, the study illustrates that through integrated urban-rural development, it is possible to (1) reduce the income gap between urban and rural areas to promote the realization of common prosperity in the material dimension; (2) facilitate the equal supply of basic public services between urban and rural areas to promote the realization of common prosperity in the dimension of rights; (3) balance urban and rural development capabilities to promote the realization of common prosperity in the dimension of development opportunities; (4) coordinate the construction of urban-rural spiritual civilization to promote the realization of common prosperity in the spiritual dimension; (5) stimulate the integration between urban and rural ecological environment to promote the realization of common prosperity in the ecological dimension. In addition, after sorting out the international experience of integrated urban-rural development, the study finds that major developed countries and some emerging countries have established (1) an urban-rural economic linkage mechanism of in-depth integration and benefit sharing; (2) an urban-rural ecological environment linkage mechanism of overall planning and sustainable development; (3) an urban-rural public service linkage mechanism of urban-rural equivalent and comprehensive coverage. Aiming at the goals of common prosperity concerning farmers’ rights, industrial development, education equity and ecological value conversion, the paper combines the opinions of the experts participating in the “Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Common Prosperity” academic seminar with literature to propose seven policy paths for integrated urban-rural development: (1) promoting urban-rural economic integration by achieving equal rights to urban and rural development; (2) taking advantage of industrial clusters development model to promote urban-rural economic integration; (3) improving the income distribution system to promote urban-rural economic integration; (4) promoting the ecological integration between urban and rural areas with the realization of ecological products value; (5) facilitating the integration of urban and rural public services with the cultivation of early childhood human capital; (6) stimulating the integration of urban and rural public services with the realization of education equity; (7) advancing the integration of urban and rural public services with the development model of “inter-village integration”. The paper reveals that urban-rural integration requires further institutional reform, as well as the different varieties of policies aiming at special demands. Therefore, grassroots innovation and careful consideration of the differences across different groups and different regions could be fully guaranteed to achieve common prosperity.
Keywords:common prosperity  urban-rural integration  rurbanomics  rural development  international experience  
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号