首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

行政附带民事诉讼必要性质疑
引用本文:张继荣.行政附带民事诉讼必要性质疑[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,22(1):105-108.
作者姓名:张继荣
作者单位:河南省政法管理干部学院,行政法系,河南,郑州,450002
摘    要:行政附带民事诉讼在理论提出的同时,其司法实践的尝试却遇到诸如管辖、法庭调查、举证、辩论、裁判等方面的困难;对产生行政附带民事诉讼的行政机关裁决民事争议制度,立法在减少相关规定,行政机关在放弃这类职权;反观其理论本身就具有缺陷,未考虑行政附带民事诉讼与刑事附带民事诉讼的差异而进行简单的借鉴,导致诉讼过程中参与各方利益关系失衡.行政附带民事诉讼实无存在之必要.

关 键 词:行政附带民事诉讼  诉讼程序  必要性
文章编号:1006-2920(2003)01-0105-04
修稿时间:2002年11月26

Questioning the Necessarity of Administrative with Civil Action
ZHANG Ji-rong.Questioning the Necessarity of Administrative with Civil Action[J].Journal of Henan Education Institute(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2003,22(1):105-108.
Authors:ZHANG Ji-rong
Abstract:When the theory of administrative with civil action was raised, its judicial and praction attempts faced up to some difficulties such as jurisdiction, court investigation giving evidence, argument, etc. The legislation of the systems that administrative organs should adjudge the administrative with civil action,has been reduced.And administrative organs intend to give up the adjudgment rights. On the other hand, the theory itself has defects. The theory has been simply used for reference without considering the difference between criminal with civil action and administrative with civil action, with the result that the interests of each participants are out of blance during the proceedings. It is no necessarily for administrative with civil action toexist.
Keywords:administrative with civil action  judicial procedure  necessarity  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号