公共管理理论创新三题

本文作者就公共管理理论创新，从不同视角阐述了各自的观点。陈振明提出重视对政府治理与改革的创新研究。指出，当代国外的公共管理的理论和实践已发生了深刻的变化，形成了各种不同的治理与改革理论范式与实践模式；而当前我国的政府治理与改革产生了大量急需解决的重大问题，尤其是随着我国经济的发展及市场体制的逐步成熟，社会的阶层、结构、运转方式乃至观念都产生了深刻的变迁，客观上需要我国构建新型的公共治理体系，以适应经济发展和社会变革的需要。因此，必须加强政府治理与改革的创新研究，以推进我国政府治理变革。张成福提出公共行政或公共管理的学术研究及理论创新必须关注“大”问题或学科的核心问题，认为当代公共行政领域需要认真研究的“大”问题有：公民在公共行政中的角色问题；公共行政中的公共利益导向问题；公共行政中的公共行动问题；公共行政中多重角色之间的互动问题；公共行政中的公共责任实现问题等。在公共行政的学术研究与理论创新中，可以比较不同国家特色，但要在我国当前体制及现实状况下来研究具体问题。周志忍就公共管理的研究方法与理论创新着重指出几点：研究的问题导向性；研究综述的写作；研究范围的确定；善于观察，联系实际，避免学术研究走极端。

Three Subjects of Public Management Theory innovation

This paper expounds several viewpoints on public management theory innovation from different perspectives. Chen Zhengmin proposed to put emphasis on innovation of government administration and reform. He pointed out that foreign administration theory and practice have been changed deeply and different administration and reform theoretic modes have formed. However, many problems in our country＇s government administration and reform are urgent to be solved. Especially, with the graduate maturity of our country＇s economy and market mechanism, the social stratum, structure, running ways and concepts have changed deeply, which ask for establishing a new public management system in adapt to needs of the economy development and society reform. Zhang Chengfu presented that the academic research on the public administration and management should focus on ＂big＂ problems or core question. The ＂big＂ problems in public administration are： the roles of citizens; the public benefit orientation; the public actions; the interaction among multi-roles; the public responsibility, etc. In public administration academic research and theory innovation, researches can be carded out by comparing different country＇s characteristics under the background of our country＇s system and practical status. Zhou Zhiren pointed several key points on public research methods and theory form： orientation of research problems; writing of research review; confirmation of research scope; and observing and combining practice to prevent the academic research from going to extremes.