中国逻辑史研究的误区

我国解放后的中国逻辑史研究虽取得了一定成就,但也存在着诸多的弊端与局限。这就是:将"逻辑应用"当作"逻辑理论",用主观臆断代替分析论证,而为求得名辩的逻辑地位,则采取捕风捉影、曲解逻辑义理等手段。这些现象的存在,已严重阻碍了我国名辩研究的健康深入开展。

Some Malpractices in the Study of the History of Chinese Logic

In spite of the fact that the study of the history of Chinese logic has made great progress after the foundation of new China, there remain various malpractices, which could be found in the following phenomena: logic appliances being taken as logic theory; subjective judgment being regarded as analysis and demonstration; misinterpreting the rule of logic to gain some logical significance for naming and debate. All those mistakes have severely hindered the furtherance of the study of Chinese naming and debate.