首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

医疗纠纷损害赔偿诉讼举证责任分配原则之比较分析
引用本文:包冰锋,陈今玉.医疗纠纷损害赔偿诉讼举证责任分配原则之比较分析[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,29(1).
作者姓名:包冰锋  陈今玉
作者单位:1. 西南政法大学法学院,重庆,401120
2. 重庆市南岸区人民检察院,重庆,400060
摘    要:举证责任是民事诉讼的脊椎,举证责任分配是举证责任的核心。事实本身说明过失原则、表见证明、大概推定原则都是在司法实务中以判例的形式确立起来的,旨在当待证事实处于举证困难时,法官在当事人之间分配不利益风险所采取的一种证明方法。上述三原则的功能在于把因果关系或过失的提供证据的责任转给医疗机构承担,当医疗机构提供的证据不能说服法官形成确实心证时,将承担败诉的风险。

关 键 词:民事诉讼  举证责任分配  事实本身说明过失原则  表见证明  大概推定  

On Theory about Allocating Burden of Proof in Lawsuit of Medical Disputes
BAO Bing-feng,CHEN Jin-yu.On Theory about Allocating Burden of Proof in Lawsuit of Medical Disputes[J].Journal of Xihua University:Philosophy & Social Sciences,2010,29(1).
Authors:BAO Bing-feng  CHEN Jin-yu
Institution:1.Southwest University of Politics and Law;Chongqing;401120;China;2.The People's Procuratorate of Chongqing Nan'an;400060;China
Abstract:Burden of proof is the backbone of litigation;and allocation of burden of proof is the core.Res ipsa loquitur,superficial proof and rough inference are established by case in practice.They are proof ways of allocating non-interest by judge when the fact is difficult to prove.The function of the three principles is to shift the risk of lose to medical institution when the proof can't persuade judge.
Keywords:civil procedure  allocation of burden of proof  res ipsa loquitur  superficial proof  rough inference  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号