首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

GARCH类模型波动率预测效果评价——以沪铜期货为例
引用本文:赵伟雄,崔海蓉,何建敏.GARCH类模型波动率预测效果评价——以沪铜期货为例[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010,20(4):27-32.
作者姓名:赵伟雄  崔海蓉  何建敏
作者单位:东南大学,经济管理学院,江苏,南京,211189
摘    要:以沪铜期货为例,研究了GARCH、EGARCH、FIGARCH和FIEGARCH四种模型的波动率预测效果。以已实现波动率为模型评价衡量标准,分别采用M-Z回归和损失函数进行预测效果检验,结果表明,无论残差服从高斯分布还是t-分布,不同的GARCH类模型预测效果有显著差异,其中FIGARCH模型预测效果最好,其次是GARCH模型,EGARCH和FIEGARCH模型预测效果不佳。此结论说明我国铜期货市场具有显著的长记忆性,但不具有非对称效应。

关 键 词:GARCH类模型  波动率  预测  评价

Evaluation on Volatility Forecasting of GARCH-Type Models: Evidence from Shanghai Copper Futures
ZHAO WEIXIONG,CUI HAIRONG,HE JIANMIN.Evaluation on Volatility Forecasting of GARCH-Type Models: Evidence from Shanghai Copper Futures[J].Journal of Xidian University (Social Sciences Edition),2010,20(4):27-32.
Authors:ZHAO WEIXIONG  CUI HAIRONG  HE JIANMIN
Institution:(School of Economics & Management,Southeast University,Nanjing,211189,China)
Abstract:This paper studies volatility forecasting performance of GARCH,EGARCH,FIGARCH,and FIEGARCH models.Realized volatility is seen as a benchmark.M-Z regression and loss function are used to assess the effect of volatility forecasting.The results show that under the assumption of Gaussian distribution or t-distribution,GARCH-type models predicting effectiveness are significantly different: FIGARCH best,GARCH second,EGARCH and FIEGARCH worst.This conclusion shows that copper futures market has a significant long memory,but not an asymmetric effect.
Keywords:GARCH-Type models  Volatility  Prediction  Evaluation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号